One Eye On The Prize, One Eye On A Cloud: The Hobby Writer
I’ve spent a lot of time the past six days reconciling my insatiable need to only write for a living with the fact that writers typically have a day job, especially debut novelists. Suffice it to say that my first published book, if I’m lucky enough to be published, won’t feed me unless it is absolutely stellar, and while I’m not exactly doubting my ability to write well, it would be competing with an entire ocean of stories.
For a lot of people who want to be writers, this is actually bad news, capable of persuading the next big thing to live a life of wage servitude forever. And if that person’s lucky to find something else they love - say, a wannabe writer who also likes photography very much and can turn that into a lucrative freelance gig - more power to you, and I wish I could have the same kind of fortune as that hypothetical person.
It’s a unique dichotomy, right? People want you to ‘follow your dreams’, to do what will make you happy - but they simultaneously charge you to ‘be practical’. And I can’t blame both of them. They’re both good. But only one can be fulfilling.
I usually avoid The Onion - sometimes it’s solid satire, and other times… but then this op-ed happened:
It could be anything—music, writing, drawing, acting, teaching—it really doesn’t matter. All that matters is that once you know what you want to do, you dive in a full 10 percent and spend the other 90 torturing yourself because you know damn well that it’s far too late to make a drastic career change, and that you’re stuck on this mind-numbing path for the rest of your life.
Is there any other way to live?
I can’t stress this enough: Do what you love…in between work commitments, and family commitments, and commitments that tend to pop up and take immediate precedence over doing the thing you love.
Delightful, isn’t it? Why?
This is what the dichotomy means. This is your parents telling you that wanting to be a musician or a dancer is ‘quaint’. This is who Tarrus Riley is addressing in that one song he wrote.
This is the face, the really exaggerated face, of people who don’t get how much you may feel about the thing you love doing.
And I’ll be real: it’s a dragon I have no idea how to slay.
I mean, for the most part they’re right. I could write a book and still starve. Chances are that’s what’ll happen, no matter how actually brilliant it may be.
But I don’t know exactly how much that’ll bother me, either. In my head, I think if I were to write a book now, while I’m still doing nothing, before I actually get a job, I’d feel a whole lot better about the cubicle slavery. It means I can, and it means I have no good reason not to do it again, and over and over again at that. Even if it’s a little serial on my writing blog that I know people are actually reading, I’d absolutely enjoy just the idea that people are gaining some kind of fulfillment from reading my stuff. That’s one of the things I really love about writing - it’s an opportunity for me, personally, to write to be noticed, to have an opinion that no one cuts me off from expressing, and to have people really relate to it and be part of a discussion even if they don’t agree. And if I can know that I can do that, I will.
This is not me saying I would like a nine-to-five. I mean, I write in the afternoon, over several cups of tea (because the really delightfully aptly named Writers Tears Irish Whiskey is too expensive to import). Put me in a cubicle and I will, as Ferguson’s op-ed describes, pass out in the dead of night, dreaming myself rapidly from chapter to chapter, but having written nothing. I enjoy doing nothing. I only want to write something that will feed me so I can have the freedom to keep writing without hindrance.
And things like this - addresses to the Prize-Fixed Eye and the Cloud-Fixed Eye alike - drive me in really unnerving ways. Which, I think, is what I need.